News
Custom Search

The Shub Gallery

Horses from amerry-go-round
Special Features

For Your Benefit
- For Directors Only
Feed back/polls

Title I of the ADA : Job-Discrimination Protection

PWDs Have Job-Discrimination Protection

By Cindy Powell

Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects persons with disabilities (PWDs) from employment discrimination. Private employers with 15 or more employees, including part-timers; employment agencies; labor unions; and state and local governments, regardless of the number of employees, must comply with Title I of the ADA.

Covered entities must ensure that their employment practices and policies do not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities. Every aspect of employment is covered, including recruitment, hiring, promotion, demotion, layoff and return from layoff, compensation, job assignments, job classifications, paid or unpaid leave, fringe benefits, training and employer-sponsored activities, including recreational or social programs.

Private employers with fewer than 15 employees, corporations owned by the federal government, Native American tribes and private-membership clubs that are not labor organizations are exempt from Title I. Federal government agencies are covered by nondiscrimination and affirmative employment requirements under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title I of the ADA. The employment provisions for state and local governments with fewer than 15 employees are enforced by the Department of Justice.

The ADA is applied on a "case-by-case" basis. An employer is not required to provide an accommodation if it will impose an undue hardship on the operation of his business. As defined by the ADA, an undue hardship is an action that is unduly costly, extensive, substantial, or disruptive or would fundamentally alter the nature or operation of the business. In determining undue hardship, factors to be considered include the nature and cost of the accommodation, overall financial resources and number of persons employed.

An employer may require that an individual not pose a "direct threat" to the health or safety of self or others. A health or safety risk can only be considered if it is a significant risk of substantial harm. The risk must be based on valid medical analyses or other objective evidence, rather than speculation.

Employers cannot deny an employment opportunity to a qualified applicant with a disability merely because of a slightly increased health or safety risk to self or others. If an individual appears to pose a direct threat because of a disability, the employer must first try to eliminate or reduce the risk with reasonable accommodation. If an effective accommodation cannot be found, the employer may refuse to hire an applicant or discharge an employee who poses a direct threat.

If an applicant or employee believes that he or she has experienced employment discrimination because of a disability, he or she may file a charge related to that claim with the EEOC within 180 days of the alleged act. When charges or complaints are filed after 180 days, individuals may not be able to obtain resolution.

Cindy Powell is an information specialist for theDisability and Business Technical Assistance Center of the Rocky Mountain ADA Center in Colorado.


Navigation for drop down menu

ABOUT US: | Contact Information| Editorial Team| Terms | Contributors| Submissions|
ADERTISING: | Opportunities | Classified | Informercial | Underwriters|
ARCHIVES: | Archived Issues| Cover Stories | Features|
MARKET PLACE: | Advertisers | Products | Services| Subscriptions
MISCELANEOUS: | More News| Links'| Feedback| Polls|
SEARCH: | Web site | Internet',| Donate|


Latest News

ILUSA.Com

Calendar of Events

 
 
separation bar
Find Out What All the Buzz Is About.Gettinghired.com
separation bar
 
separation bar
 
Ode to a Diet Coke: Disability, Choices and Control.”

Copyright © 2009 by ILCHV